top of page
You Could Believe in Nothing

You Could Believe in Nothing

Jamie Fitzpatrick’s debut novel tells of a muddled adulthood in St. John’s, Newfoundland. Derek is forty-one years old. His girlfriend has just left him for a job in Ottawa, his father, a DJ at the local classic rock station, is about to go to court, and his rec hockey team is up in arms about a TV reporter’s attempts to glorify their weekly games. When Derek’s half-brother, Curtis, comes home, the visit stirs up nagging questions about their parents’ early days, and Derek examines again what it means to make commitments that may or may not bring real happiness.

Fitzpatrick captures the subtleties of casual conversation and the often understated wit that emerges between old friends. Having grown up after the decline of whatever might have been the real Newfoundland, Derek and his teammates are generally at a loss to defend the urban, mostly wayward lives the occupy. Set into a wet spring in St. John’s, its rinks, streets, and landmarks, and the sunken map of old haunts and years gone by, You Could Believe in Nothing is a study in familiarity and self-definition, underlining how little we sometimes know about ourselves and the people we know best.

Join the Conversation Today...

 

WRITE A REVIEW
average rating is 2 out of 5, based on 1 votes, book lovers sharing their thoughts

100 % would recommend

Thanks for submitting a review! 😘

Oliver Hallett

Location:

Newfoundland and Labrador

average rating is 2 out of 5

Time Published

You Could Believe in Nothing

You Could Believe In Nothing by Jamie Fitzpatrick is a book that I wish I could have enjoyed more. It is well written, especially when it comes to the structure of its dialogue. I could hear it all very clearly and it's obvious that the author is very familiar with the Newfoundland dialect and how people tend to socialize with each other here. It was also very interesting to see aspects of St. John's that I was very familiar with (the hockey rink featured in many scenes is the one next door to where I went to junior high/high school) and aspects that I don't know as well.

The main problem for me lies in the protagonist. Derek reads as a rather accurate depiction of many men his age, but in this case that's more depressing than impressive to me. A lot of his offhand observations, especially the ones about women, made me extremely uncomfortable, even angry at times. It would be one thing if he changed on this front over the course of the novel, but he unfortunately does not. He wasn't the only character I took issue with, but since he's the point of view character he gave me the most trouble. In all honesty, I struggled a bit with finishing this novel, but the writing was solid enough for me to push through.

I recognize that the author is good at what he does and I would be willing to give his other work a shot, but I wouldn't recommend this particular book to any like-minded peers.

I recommend this book.

bottom of page